THROWAWAY PROTOTYPE

Mismo problema, tres interfaces y tres authoring models. No es una valoración real.

VAAS · Investment committee brief · Illustrative

Decision in one sentence

The base case supports diligence—not yet commitment.

Why now

A 20 MW solar portfolio clears the first valuation screen, but grid timing and PPA concentration still dominate the downside.

Base enterprise value$25.0MCurrent underwriting assumptions

The asset is interesting because the downside can be investigated before capital is committed.

The next move is a bounded diligence sprint: confirm interconnection, normalize the PPA, and reconcile debt. The interface puts the decision before the machinery.

Stress the assumption, then read the consequence.

Astro produced the document as HTML. A small browser script handles only this calculator—no React application is required.

Enterprise value$25,000,000
Less: debt($8,000,000)
Indicative equity value$17,000,000

Illustrative screen only. Not authoritative Mycroft output or investment advice.

A visual model replaces five pages of process prose.

  1. 01VerifySource documents and ownership
  2. 02NormalizePPA, debt, and operating data
  3. 03Stress-testTiming, pricing, and downside
  4. 04DecideAdvance, reprice, or stop

Three questions, in order.

  1. 01Is the grid-interconnection date evidenced?
  2. 02How concentrated is contracted revenue?
  3. 03Does normalized debt reconcile to source documents?